The HIS 100 Zinn and Schweikart’s assumptions and interpretations of the history article focus on different perspectives of historians. The significant distinction between Zinn and Schweikart is their patriotism. Having read their assumptions, beliefs, and values, Schweikart is a true patriot. Moreover, he seems to believe America couldn’t be better. Zinn, however, is saying America needs to learn from history to improve. That also affects their interpretation of history and leads to historical biases between Zinn and Schweikart. For instance, how you feel personally based on your beliefs and values is going to affect how you process information. The article is useful in understanding Zinn and Schweikart’s interpretation of history as well as the biases in their understanding.
For more information on HIS 100 Zinn and Schweikart personal assumptions, click
ZINN AND SCHWEIKART INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY AND THE BIASES THAT EXIST
The essay helps in understanding Zinn and Schweikart’s interpretation of history and the biases that they exhibit. A People’s History of the United States” shows the effects that explorers had on the native people and in history. Zinn’s perspective is of the victims’ perspective, and he plays on the emotions of people reading his book. However, it’s not an entirely accurate perspective as he’s speculative in the way the natives and others felt. The historical biases between Zinn and Schweikart between the two manifest in their works. “A Patriot’s History of the United States” is the complete opposite of “A People’s History of the United States.” The HIS 100 Zinn and Schweikart’s assumptions and interpretations of history article highlight the historians’ perceived biases.
For more information on Zinn and Schweikart interpretation of history and the biases that exist, click
HISTORICAL BIASES BETWEEN ZINN AND SCHWEIKART FROM THEIR INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY
There are several historical biases between Zinn and Schweikart when it comes to their interpretation of history. A People’s History of the United States” shows a left-wing view of history. Also, the book bases on Zinn’s personal experiences, where he states that he got attacked while protesting, he writes. Moreover, Zinn and Schweikart’s interpretation of history leads to biases developing due to different perceptions that they hold. “A People’s History of the United States” in preferences. Also, he writes with the perspective against capitalism. His biases manifest clearly even before you read the book. The HIS 100 Zinn and Schweikart’s assumptions and interpretation article explain the prejudices that exist.
Additional attachments
