The fight against racism and the government contribution towards racism basis is on the reforms a country has established. In Belgium, for example, fighting racism and all forms of discrimination throughout the world is one of its priorities. The Belgian Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism has a remit to combat discrimination in various forms. Additionally, Belgium plays a role in the elimination of racism and discrimination by participating in UN conferences against racism. The meetings have enabled the adoption of final documents reasserting the importance of combating racism at the international level. The documents also set out the specific issues arising and propose some possible lines of action to take. The European Union has also affected Belgium’s fight against racism and the government’s contribution towards racism. For more information on fight against racism and government contribution towards racism, click
GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS RACISM IN BALTIMORE
The fight against racism and the government contribution towards racism in Baltimore in recent years is questionable. In 1910, for example, a black graduate of Yale Law School purchased a home in a previously all-white neighborhood. The result was the Baltimore city government adopting a residential segregation ordinance that restricted African Americans to designated blocks. The government’s contribution towards racism through past years has only been to quarantine Baltimore’s black population in isolated slums. In 1925, 18 Baltimore neighborhood associations came together to form the “Allied Civic and Protective Association.” The purpose of the association was to urge both new and existing property owners to sign racially restrictive covenants. The association promoted racism and discrimination by ensuring African Americans did not purchase properties. For more information on government contribution towards racism in Baltimore, visit
GOVERNMENTS ROLE IN ADDRESSING RACISM AND DISCRIMINATION
The fight against racism and the government contribution towards racism was in May 2008, discussed by OSCE. The meeting’s title was the Role of National Institutions against Discrimination in Combating Racism and Xenophobia. Before the meeting, a “roundtable for civil society” was organized by (ODIHR). This was to enable civil society representatives to prepare recommendations for presentations during the Opening Session of the SHDM. The majority of the OSCE countries have little to no efforts on dealing specifically with racism and discrimination. This is despite putting in place national human rights or ombudsman institutions to deal with human rights violations. The SHDM also examined national institutions’ role in responding to and combating racism and xenophobia. In particular, emphasize was placed on cases involving persons belonging to national minorities and migrants. A Conference featuring three panels focused on the role of NIADs in the fight against racism.